![]() ![]() It was widely reported that the Cleveland Browns player was wearing an RM 56-02, however, it actually looks more like the older RM 56-01, which is (very marginally) less expensive at $1.95 million instead of $2.02 million, according to Professional Watches. However, when it came to the game against the New York Jets, Beckham's wrists were bare. Watch Odell Beckham take to Twitter to underline his horological recalcitrance re: sidelining his Richard Mille RM 11-03, perhaps clocking the favorable publicity given Rafael Nadal’s Mille at the U.S. The wide receiver was spotted wearing another ultra-expensive Richard Mille timepiece while warming up ahead of "Monday Night Football." So leave it to Odell Beckham Jr., the NFL’s reigning fashion superstar, to show off his favorite timepiece while playing in the Cleveland Browns’ season opener. made good on his promise to continue wearing a watch while playing football - almost. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. The lightness and durability of Richard Mille's tourbillons have allowed the likes of Nadal, Beckham Jr., and Yohan Blake to wear them in competitionthanks to space-age technology, Nadal's.It was his visor that caused him issues on Monday, though, as he was pulled to the sideline to swap his gold-tinted visor for a clear one while the Browns were at third and goal.Beckham said after last week's debut that his watch did not violate the NFL's rules against hard objects: "The watch is plastic.".The wide receiver upped the ante on Monday, opting for a different, $2 million watch to warm up in, however, this time he took it off before the game.Beckham caused controversy last week for wearing a watch while playing his debut for the Cleveland Browns.wore another ultra-expensive Richard Mille watch ahead of "Monday Night Football." On Sunday, the Cleveland Browns wide receiver. ![]() wears his Richard Mille watches everywhere. has always been known as a fan of fashion, but his latest style statement is getting him in trouble both on the field and off. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |